One
of the significant things about the Theology of the Body is that it has quite
practical implications for how we live our lives. One of our parishioners, Bill
Barto, has sent in a review of a book by a pair of evangelical pastors that
deals with the topic of dating and relationships. They pick up on some of the same themes as
John Paul II. Here is what Bill has to
say:
In “Sex, Dating, and Relationships: A Fresh Approach,”
the authors (Gerald Hiestand and Jay Thomas, who are pastors themselves and
well-known bloggers) contend that human sexual
relationships and the Gospel are "intrinsically linked" in that our
sexuality is a "type" or image of the relationship between God and
his church. Just as Christ is monogamous and loyal to his bride, the church, we
are called to reflect these values in our monogamous and permanent marital
relationships. Our relationships with others must reflect the life-changing
nature of the gospel: "life has a higher purpose than our autonomous
satisfaction."
The authors
then describe what they consider to be the biblical standard for sexual
relationships: in their assessment, "all premarital sexual activity is
outside the bounds of the New Testament ethic." And sexual activity is
defined pretty broadly; if one would not engage in the activity with a family
member, then it is out of bounds for persons who are dating. The authors
helpfully illustrate this teaching by the use of what they call "the
God-ordained categories of male-female relationships." Relying upon
scripture, the authors note that God commands sexual relations between married
people and prohibits it between others; in their assessment, there is no
biblically-based category of relationships that allows sexual activity because
a couple is dating.
Of course, the
entire dating system in contemporary culture is structured quite differently,
and the authors spend some time discussing how dating as practiced tends toward
sexual activity and operates to the detriment of those hoping for more
substantial relationships by placing intimacy before friendship. The authors
describe an alternative in what they call "dating friendships," in
which two people intentionally spend time in each other's company, not with an
eye toward imminent intimacy, but to learn about one another in an effort to
determine whether the other is "spouse material." Courtship would
begin under this model once the couple had committed to marriage, and intimacy
would be deferred until marriage. This portion of the book would be
particularly valuable for parents or pastors trying to educate young people
what friendship of this sort would look like and how Christian courtship could
actually work.
This is a
worthwhile book to read for single Christians of all ages, parents, and
pastors. It is easy to read and its arguments readily understandable. The
authors are evangelicals but they articulate a vision of chastity that would be
recognizable to any orthodox Christian. I think that they would agree with the
Catechism of the Catholic Church when it says that "self-mastery is a long
and exacting work," but that "sexuality . . . becomes personal and
truly human when it is integrated into the relationship of one person to
another, in the complete and life-long mutual gift of a man and a woman."
Indeed their teaching could be said to be a practical application of the
"theology of the body" enunciated by Pope John Paul II, with its
emphasis on chastity, mutual gift, monogamy, and permanence. When I recently
finished reading “Man and Woman He Created Them,” by John Paul II, I was left
wondering how the theology of the body would work in contemporary relationships;
this valuable book gives great insight on that point and explains how it could
actually work.
This is not to
say that the book is not without some flaws. Some readers will find the
authors' biblical analysis of relationships in chapter two to be somewhat
conclusory, but I commend the authors for unashamedly articulating a biblical
standard for dating relationships. I have been attending church for over forty
years and have never heard teaching toward chastity quite so powerfully
expressed.
Other readers
may conclude that the authors' approach to the issues tends toward the
legalistic, with its emphasis on the prohibition of sexual activity between
unmarried persons. More elaboration upon the theological reason for this
prohibition (in addition to asserting its existence) would probably be
necessary to persuade non-evangelicals of its necessity. In this regard, I was
struck on occasion by the word choices by the authors: for example, the authors
conclude their introduction to the book by prayerfully asking that God
"turn our very gray world of subjectivity into a black-and-white world of
Christ-honoring, grace-filled, sexual purity!" I know what they were
trying to say, but "black-and-white"? The good news that the authors
are seeking to explain could be said to be less about the
"black-and-white" and more about the fact that intimate, life-long,
loyal relationships are actually more colorful and robust than we can yet
imagine!
This is one of
the few recent books that I have encountered that describes a sexual ethos
consistent with the theology of the body, and is well worth your attention and
effort. It could profitably serve as the basis of small-group study or
use in a home group.
No comments:
Post a Comment